Kendricks v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he post-conviction court erred in holding that the petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims were barred for failure to raise them on direct appeal.”
• “[W]e do not believe that the Legislature intended the issue of ineffective assistance of . . . counsel to be waived if not raised on direct appeal.”
• “[B]ecause of the significant amount of development and factfinding” required for these claims, “we do not believe the Legislature intended the issue of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel to be waived if not raised on direct appeal.”
• collecting cases holding the same

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).