Kendrick v. Sullivan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that hypothetical legal questions and discovery as to legal arguments are impermissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
  District of Columbia· 2011-11-17· cited 12×
• Huthnance v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia· 2008-12-15· cited 8×
• Sherrod v. Breitbart
  District of Columbia· 2014-06-09· cited 1×
• Escamilla v. Nuyen
  District of Columbia· 2015-07-14

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bowen v. Kendrick
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 491×
• In Re Convergent Technologies Securities Litigation
  N.D. California· 1985-10-28· cited 337×
• O'Brien v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
  N.D. Georgia· 1977-12-21· cited 7×
• Kendrick v. Bowen
  District of Columbia· 1987-05-15· cited 7×