Kendrick v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Evidence which incidentally may place a criminal defendant’s character in issue is admissible if independently relevant, such as to show knowledge, motive, plans, intent, scheme or identity.”
• “Evidence which incidentally may place a criminal defendant’s character in issue is admissible if independently relevant, such as to show knowledge, motive, plans, intent, scheme or identity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wiggins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-06-24· cited 10×
• Gill v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1987-06-08· cited 2×
• Rebecca Wiggins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-06-24

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dill v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1966-12-05· cited 105×
• Hanson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1977-09-07· cited 15×
• Garrett v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-01-24· cited 8×
• Harden v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1950-05-23· cited 4×