Skip to main content
· 7/2/1986

Kendrick v. City of Greensboro

Citations

  • 317 N.C. 335
  • 346 S.E.2d 500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a subsequent patent application was properly anticipated by an earlier patent when the subsequent application merely changed the “size or utility” of the earlier patent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.