· 7/2/1986
Kendrick v. City of Greensboro
Citations
- 317 N.C. 335
- 346 S.E.2d 500
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a subsequent patent application was properly anticipated by an earlier patent when the subsequent application merely changed the “size or utility” of the earlier patent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.