Skip to main content
· 12/31/1992

Kendrick v. Allright Parking

Citations

  • 846 S.W.2d 453
  • 1992 Tex. App. LEXIS 3290
  • 1992 WL 400639

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the distinction between premises that are prone to attract criminal activity and those that are not
  • recognizing the distinction between premises that are prone to attract criminal activity and those that are not
  • fact questions as to the foreseeability of the kidnapping and rape of a parking lot customer precluded summary judgment
  • fact questions as to the foreseeability of the kidnapping and rape of a parking lot customer precluded summary judgment
  • lack of specific incidents of prior criminal activities not conclusive on the issue of foreseeability
  • security expert's testimony raised fact question as to whether criminal attack was foreseeable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Butts, Chapa, Carr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.