· 12/31/1992
Kendrick v. Allright Parking
Citations
- 846 S.W.2d 453
- 1992 Tex. App. LEXIS 3290
- 1992 WL 400639
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing the distinction between premises that are prone to attract criminal activity and those that are not
- recognizing the distinction between premises that are prone to attract criminal activity and those that are not
- fact questions as to the foreseeability of the kidnapping and rape of a parking lot customer precluded summary judgment
- fact questions as to the foreseeability of the kidnapping and rape of a parking lot customer precluded summary judgment
- lack of specific incidents of prior criminal activities not conclusive on the issue of foreseeability
- security expert's testimony raised fact question as to whether criminal attack was foreseeable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Butts, Chapa, Carr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.