KENDRIA WALKER v. TONYA BULLOCK

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “On this record, permitting relocation is an abuse of discretion, because there is no competent substantial evidence to support it.”
• “The trial court’s 2 decision will be affirmed if the statutory findings are supported by substantial competent evidence.”
• “This court’s review is hampered, because the trial court made no findings of fact, either oral or written, on any of the relevant factors involved in a decision to grant or deny relocation.”
• trial court’s decision on relocation request will be affirmed only if statutory findings are supported by substantial competent evidence; trial court abused its discretion in permitting relocation where there was no competent substantial evidence to support it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).