Kendig v. Roberts
Citations
- 187 Pa. 339
- 40 A. 1022
- 1898 Pa. LEXIS 813
Syllabus
<p>Contract — Contradictions in written contract -Parol testimony — Province of court and jury.</p> <p>Where a written contract refers to plans, specifications, drawings and a bill of items, and it appears upon inspection that the bill of items is contradictory of the specifications and drawings, parol testimony is admissible to detei'mine which paper was intended by the parties to govern, and the question is one of fact for the jury, and not one of construction of written terms for the court.</p>
Judges: Dean, Fell, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Pee, Stbreett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.