Skip to main content
· 2/5/1965

Kendall v. State ex rel. Department of Highways

Citations

  • 247 La. 342
  • 170 So. 2d 864

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • antitrust immunity because “the state supervision of the challenged activity is comprehensive and active”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Art, Being, Code, McCaleb, Relator

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.