Kendall v. State, Division of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring expert testimony to establish standard of care in medical malpractice cases when negligence not evident to laypersons
• applying rule in medical malpractice case and affirming defendants’ summary judgment because Kendall did not carry her burden by presenting expert testimony rebutting defendants' showing that there was no genuine issue as to negligence
• affirming summary judgment because adverse party “presented no expert affidavits and did not show, based on the evidence that was presented, that a reasonably arguable case of medical negligence existed”
• plaintiff waived her challenge to statutory adequacy of expert advisory panel's findings by not raising it before the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).