Kendall v. San Juan Silver Mining Co.
Citations
- 144 U.S. 658
- 12 S. Ct. 779
- 36 L. Ed. 583
- 1892 U.S. LEXIS 2115
Syllabus
<p>Intrusion upon and location of a mining claim within the territory set apart by the treaty proclaimed November 4, 1868, for the exclusive use and occupancy of the confederated bands of Ute Indians, was forbidden thereby,- and was inoperative to confer any rights upon the plaintiffs. Location of the same premises by others after extinguishment of the Indian title, and prior to relocation of the former prohibited claini, gave the right of possession. ° '</p> <p>The failure of the plaintiffs to record their location after extinguishment of such Indian title. within the period prescribed by the laws of Colorado, and until long after the premises had been properly located by others, forbids their claim of priority based upon a wrongful entry during the existence of the Indian Reservation.</p> <p>Noonan v. Caledonia Mining Co., 121 U. S. 393, cited and distinguished.</p>
Judges: Field
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rasmussen Drilling, Inc., a Colorado Corporation Licensed to Do Business in Wyoming v. Kerr-Mcgee Nuclear Corporation and Kerr-Mcgee CorporationTenth Circuit· 1978-02-13· cited 133×
- Republic Natural Gas Co. v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1948-05-03· cited 121×
- Andrus v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1980-06-02· cited 112×
- Butte City Water Co. v. BakerSupreme Court· 1905-01-03· cited 64×
- Creede & Cripple Creek Mining & Milling Co. v. Uinta Tunnel Mining & Transportation Co.Supreme Court· 1905-01-30· cited 52×
- Pike v. City of WyomingMichigan Supreme Court· 1988-11-10· cited 32×
- United States v. Merle I. Zweifel and Kenneth RobertsTenth Circuit· 1975-01-14· cited 30×
- Childers v. Dallas Police DepartmentN.D. Texas· 1981-03-30· cited 10×
- Jones v. Wild Goose Mining & Trading Co.Ninth Circuit· 1910-03-11· cited 8×
- Lockhart v. FarrellUtah Supreme Court· 1906-09-29· cited 8×
- White v. Ames Mining CompanyIdaho Supreme Court· 1960-02-18· cited 5×
- Mandel v. Great Lakes Oil Etc. Co.California Court of Appeal· 1957-05-01· cited 4×
- Wright v. LyonsOregon Supreme Court· 1904-06-20· cited 3×
- Pete Lien & Sons, Inc. v. ZellmerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-05-13· cited 2×
- Work Min. & Mill. Co. v. Doctor Jack Pot Mining Co.Eighth Circuit· 1912-03-02· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.