Kendall v. American Automatic Loom Co.
Citations
- 198 U.S. 477
- 25 S. Ct. 768
- 49 L. Ed. 1133
- 1905 U.S. LEXIS 1080
Syllabus
<p>This court can review by appeal under § 5 of the act of March 3, 1891, the judgment of the Circuit-Court dismissing the bill on the sole ground that it never acquired jurisdiction over the defendant, a foreign corporation, for lack of proper service of process. Board of Trade v. Hammond Elevator Co., ante, p. 424.</p> <p>Where the foreign corporation was doing no business and had no assets in the State, service upon a former officer residing therein, held, insufficient under the circumstances of this case.</p>
Judges: Peckham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. BryantSupreme Court· 1937-01-04· cited 175×
- Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills v. MenefeeSupreme Court· 1915-04-12· cited 143×
- Davis v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1910-04-04· cited 77×
- Atkinson v. United States Operating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1915-04-30· cited 25×
- Farmers' & Merchants' Bank v. Federal Reserve BankE.D. Kentucky· 1922-10-14· cited 25×
- Morrisdale Coal Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Third Circuit· 1910-11-17· cited 16×
- American Electric Welding Co. v. Lalance & Grosjean Mfg. Co.First Circuit· 1918-03-18· cited 8×
- Matthews v. Montreal Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court· 1914-12-19· cited 5×
- Mission West Properties, L.P. v. Republic Properties Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-03-01· cited 4×
- Scheinman v. Bonwit, Teller & Co.City of New York Municipal Court· 1928-05-27· cited 2×
- In re GarrosiFirst Circuit· 1916-01-27· cited 2×
- Nickels v. Pullman Co.Fourth Circuit· 1919-10-23· cited 1×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.