Kendall Stout v. Borg-Warner Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the contractor “only had the duty to warn the government of dangers of which the government had no knowledge”
• explaining that the government's substantive review of specifications is sufficient, but rubber stamping is not
• explaining that the government’s substantive review of specifications is sufficient, but rubber stamping is not
• applying government contractor immunity to a failure to warn claim without reference to a “significant conflict”
• applying government contractor immunity to a failure to warn claim without reference to a \significant conflict\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).