Kenally v. Sellick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing present from prospective use in the setting of delay compensation
• distinguishing present from prospective use in the setting of delay compensation
• where Penn-DOT’s condemnation did not interfere with the condemnee’s normal use of the property, condemnee was not entitled to delay damages
• refusing delay damages where property was vacant
• refusing delay damages where property was vacant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).