Kempner's & Dodson Insurance Group v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the Commission’s finding that the claimant’s myocardial infarction was the result of his work and was not the result of a preexisting coronary-artery disease, even though there was evidence to the contrary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).