Skip to main content

Kemper's Heirs v. Hulick

Citations

  • 16 La. 44

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that knowledge that the goods will be used elsewhere “is legally irrelevant under the terms of subsection (A)(2)”
  • considering the percentage of total sales to forum state purchasers in analyzing defendant’s significant and/or long- term business activities within forum state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.