Kemper v. Dayton Bar Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a subsidiary was not controlled by the parent even though the subsidiary’s chairman reported to the parent
• “It is assumed to be the norm that a parent will have not only . . . the potential to exercise control [over the subsidiary], but to exercise it to a substantial degree.”
• “Q. But you would agree that Eonsmoke was lying to its supplier Greensun about Eonsmoke’s affiliation with 4X, correct? A. Again, I didn’t write this statement. But we mentioned that it wasn’t us, yes. Q. And that statement was not true, correct? A. Yeah, that was a false statement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).