Kempe v. Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Restatement § 307 calls for interests analysis in veil-piercing claims
• concluding that Restatement § 307 calls for interests analysis in veil-piercing claims
• noting previous cases where courts applied Louisiana law when only contact with foreign state was “the naked fact of the corporation”
• noting previous cases where courts applied Louisiana law when only contact with foreign state was “the naked fact of the corporation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).