Skip to main content
· 6/1/2020

Kemme v. Seltzer Holdings, L.L.C.

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 3142

Syllabus

Height difference in threshold of doorway to restaurant was open and obvious. Although the threshold was covered by a rug, the danger was still observable and was one a reasonable person would be expected to protect against. No other circumstances diverted the injured patron's ability to observe the danger, as the weather was dry, lighting was good, no other patrons obscured her view and she walked across the length of the deck, to the set of double doors.

Judges: M. Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.