Kemira, Inc. v. A-C Compressor Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing a claim for monetary 11 damages under article I, section 2(a) with prejudice
• Bane Act claim based on violation of 13 free speech adequately alleged where plaintiffs pled defendants “threatened them with arrest” if 14 they protested
• “a threat of false arrest does not constitute a Bane 24 Act violation of Plaintiffs’ right to be free from false arrest”
• a plaintiff must establish that the government took action because of the 19 message
• “[N]o court . . . has yet to recognize a private right of action for damages under 14 article I, section 2(a) since Degrassi [v. Cook, 29 Cal. 4th 333 (2002)].”
• “Plaintiffs do not allege any specific facts showing a unity of purpose 25 among co-conspirators, the scope of the conspiracy, what role each Defendant had in the 26 conspiracy, or how the conspiracy operated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).