Kema v. Gaddis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• clarifying that “decision and orders issued in unrelated ... cases that were not reviewed on appeal and addressed in published decisions have no precedential value”
• clarifying that \decision and orders issued in unrelated ... cases that were not reviewed on appeal and addressed in published decisions have no precedential value\
• writs of mandamus are not meant to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the lower court, nor are they intended to serve as legal remedies in lieu of normal appellate procedures
• A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to adequately address the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action
• A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action.
• A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).