Kema v. Gaddis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• clarifying that “decision and orders issued in unrelated ... cases that were not reviewed on appeal and addressed in published decisions have no precedential value”
• clarifying that \decision and orders issued in unrelated ... cases that were not reviewed on appeal and addressed in published decisions have no precedential value\
• writs of mandamus are not meant to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the lower court, nor are they intended to serve as legal remedies in lieu of normal appellate procedures
• A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to adequately address the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action
• A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action.
• A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

481 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Womble Bond Dickinson v. Kim
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2023-10-18· cited 80×
• Freitas v. Administrative Director of the Courts
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2005-07-25· cited 21×
• Brende v. Hara
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2007-01-25· cited 20×
• Hanabusa v. Lingle
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2008-12-15· cited 19×
• Cohan v. Ayabe.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2014-02-27· cited 14×
• State v. Tui.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2016-10-10· cited 11×
• Stop Rail Now v. DeCosta
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2008-10-02· cited 9×
• Kelepolo v. Fernandez . Application for Writ of Certiorari or in the alternative Petition for Writ of Mandamus, filed 09/05/2018.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2020-06-30· cited 9×
• Naipo v. Border
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2011-05-18· cited 4×
• Honolulu Police Department v. Town
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2010-02-04· cited 2×
• MURASKO v. Loo
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2011-03-07· cited 2×
• State v. Nilsawit.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2016-11-10· cited 2×
• Tierney v. Sakai
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2013-05-23
• Tierney v. County of Hawaii
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2013-05-23
• Unciano v. Chang
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2013-05-20
• Gowan v. Kubo
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2013-05-08
• Travelocity.com LP v. Chang
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2013-05-02
• Tierney v. Perkins
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2013-05-02
• Tierney v. Liu
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2013-04-29
• Benitez v. State
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2013-04-26

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gannett Pacific Corp. v. Richardson
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1978-05-26· cited 87×
• Pacific International Services Corp v. Hurip
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1994-05-12· cited 59×
• In Re Peterson v. Hawaii Electric Light Co.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1997-09-05· cited 50×
• State v. Aluli
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1995-04-12· cited 39×
• Straub Clinic & Hospital v. Kochi
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1996-05-23· cited 28×
• Lealaimatafao v. Woodward-Clyde Consultants
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1994-01-26· cited 25×