Kem Manufacturing Corporation v. Ray J. Wilder, and Rjw, Incorporated, Harold J. Gaines, Non-Party Movant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that nonparty did' not have standing under Rule 60(b
• finding that a nonparty “only” has standing to claim fraud on the court “if the nonparty's interests are directly affected by the final judgment”
• noting that “[i]t is not clear that the privity exception does any more than restate in different language the rule that persons tantamount to a party may be allowed standing”
• noting that the “general rule is that one must either be a party or a party’s legal representative in order to have standing to bring any Rule 60(b
• stating “a nonparty only has standing to raise a challenge of fraud on the court [under Rule 60(b)] if the nonparty’s interests are directly affected by the final judgment”
• “[I]n order to bring a Rule 60(b) motion a person must have standing under that rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).