Kelynack v. Yamaha Motor Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where a manufacturer extends a repair-or-replace warranty, it “does not have an unlimited time to make the repairs, but rather must repair or replace the parts within a reasonable time”
• holding that where a manufacturer extends a repair-or- replace warranty, it “does not have an unlimited time to make the repairs, but rather must repair or replace the parts within a reasonable time”
• holding that where a manufacturer extends a repair-or- replace warranty, it “does not have an unlimited time to make the repairs, but rather must repair or replace the parts within a reasonable time”
• finding that the provisions should be read dependently
• \repair and replace remedy and the exclusion of consequential damages are integral and interdependent parts of the warranty\; seller cannot \repudiate its limited obligation under the warranty while shielding itself behind another provision of the very warranty it has repudiated\
• allowing attorney’s fees as consequential damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).