Kelvin Quintanilla v. State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “prosecution comments that are aimed at exposing a lack of evidence to support a defendant’s general theory or a particular proposition are not improper.” (citing State v. Hanes, 790 N.W.2d 545, 556–57 (Iowa 2010))
• “[P]rosectuion comments that are aimed at exposing a lack of evidence to support a defendant’s general theory or a particular proposition are not improper.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).