Kelty v. Best Cabs, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no reversible error found from the introduction of insurance when “modest” verdict did not reflect passion or prejudice
• Despite plaintiff s doctor’s “monstrous testimony” about insurance, e.g., his employment of “the opprobrious term,” the “malignant term,” and “odious expression”, court held reference was inadvertent and did not prejudicially affect the substantial rights of the complaining party.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).