Kelsoe v. International Wood Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a promise not supported by consideration was gratuitous in nature “and created no legally enforceable contract right”
• holding that a promise not supported by consideration was gratuitous in nature \and created no legally enforceable contract right\
• consideration for a contract exists when “there [i]s an act, a forbearance, a determinant of a legal right, or a return promise, bargained for and given in exchange for the promise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).