Skip to main content
· 2/19/1896

Kelsey v. Welch

Citations

  • 8 S.D. 255
  • 66 N.W. 390
  • 1896 S.D. LEXIS 22

Syllabus

<p>1. With the exception of a deficiency found to exist after a foreclosure sale, it is not necessary to present to an administrator a claim secured by mortgage upon the real property of decedent.</p> <p>2. In an action to foreclose such mortgage, the heirs of such deceased person are proper parties defendant.</p> <p>3. An administrator is ordinarily a necessary party defendant in any action which will, if successfully maintained, result in a judgment prejudicial to the estate.</p> <p>4. In the absence of anything to the contrary, the presumption is that men are able and willing, in the due course of business, to pay their just debts at maturity.</p> <p>5. One who, through mistake of law, loans money with which a mortgage executed by and existing upon the real property of a person since deceased is satisfied, and takes therefor the promissory note of the guardian of the minor heirs of such deceased person, such guardian being also the owner of an undivided one-third interest in the premises, and by whom a mortgage upon said real property is executed to secure said promissory note, is not entitled to a decree in equity reviving and foreclosing the former mortgage, unless it appears from the complaint and evidence that said guardian and maker of the last-mentioned obligation is insolvent, or that his mortgaged interest in the land will be insufficient to secure the payment of the note when the same matures.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.</p>

Judges: Fuller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.