Kelsey-Hayes Co. v. Dunlop Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• erroneous interpretation as to admissibility of evidence necessitates retrial on both liability and damages
• “[the plaintiff’s] evidence was intended to demonstrate only that the defendants had violated the express terms of the Agreement. Thus, we are satisfied that this issue should not be characterized as implicating the parol evidence rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).