Skip to main content

Kelsall v. Kelsall

Citations

  • 139 Conn. 163
  • 90 A.2d 878
  • 1952 Conn. LEXIS 174

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding later filed claim of desertion raised new cause of action, not relating back to original claim of intolerable cruelty, because claims arose from separate and distinct groups of facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Jennings, Baldwin, Inglis, O'Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.