Kelly v. UHC Management Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding an arbitration agreement to be valid despite a clause allowing the employer to alter or revoke at any time
• \`[T]here is nothing inherently unfair or oppressive about arbitration clauses.' . . . [N]othing about the present agreement is unconscionable or overbearing.\
• \`[T]here is nothing inherently unfair or oppressive about arbitration clauses.' ... [N]othing about the present agreement is unconscionable or overbearing.\
• “ ‘[Tjhere is nothing inherently unfair or oppressive about arbitration clauses.’ ... [Njothing about the present agreement is unconscionable or overbearing.”
• declining to follow Hull because New York law was inapplicable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).