Skip to main content

Kelly v. State

Citations

  • 60 S.W.3d 299
  • 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 6872
  • 2001 WL 1205320

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding impeachment evidence need not be excluded under Hughes partly because “there were sources of the critical evidence other than the hearsay testimony”
  • explaining that in Hughes, State knew that “its witness had recanted once and likely would again, but it called her nonetheless” and that State’s “suspicion” that its witness would turn does not mean that State had “reason to know this for certain”
  • “In this case, although the State ‘suspected’ its witness could turn, it had no reason to know this for certain.”
  • “In this case, although the State ‘suspected’ its witness could turn, it had no reason to know this for certain.”
  • “Hughes teaches that prior knowledge is key.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kinkeade, Wright, Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.