Kelly v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that motion for continuance filed on day of trial failed to show required diligence
• holding that motion for continuance filed on day of trial failed to show required diligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dewberry v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-10-20· cited 2,718×
• Varela v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-02-08· cited 95×
• People v. Boyce
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-08-01· cited 59×
• Gonzales v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-02-27· cited 24×
• Johnson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-01-23· cited 23×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-02-20· cited 15×
• Fields v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-06-27· cited 13×
• Cabello v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1983-05-26· cited 8×
• Lewis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-06-14· cited 7×
• Ex Parte Kelly
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-07-19· cited 7×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-06-28· cited 1×
• Batson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1973-05-01· cited 1×
• Miskin Abdul Kamara v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2007-11-29
• James Douglas Crowder v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2008-05-15
• Albert Ibbarra Salas A/K/A Albert I. Salas v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-07-28
• Norman Tanksley v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1992-01-08
• Daren Stevenson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2017-02-06