Skip to main content
· 12/4/1984

Kelly v. St. Vincent Hospital

Citations

  • 692 P.2d 1350
  • 102 N.M. 201

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the Court will apply the means and motive analysis applicable to prospective contracts to an at-will contract
  • “Because the record is replete with evidence that [the defendant] had legitimate business purposes for adopting the requirement, even if [the defendant] additionally had a motive to harm [the] plaintiffs, there is no material issue of fact. Summary judgment was proper.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hendley, Neal, Minzner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.