Kelly v. Skytel Communications, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no Confrontation Clause violation where tape recordings were admitted “solely to place [defendant’s] own recorded statements in context and not for the truth of the matters asserted, [and] the informant’s credibility was simply irrelevant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).