Kelly v. Sears Roebuck and Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiff alleged defendant had a practice of selling used batteries, but did not allege he actually received one of the used batteries
• “Reliance on the part of the plaintiff is not an element of the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).