Kelly v. PIERCE ROOFING CO., INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6) did not apply because “action arose as a complaint on a property lien”
• even though damages awarded were less than $10,000, final judgment in an action that arose as a complaint on a lien against real property is directly appealable
• “Once the movant has made a prima facie showing that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, the burden shifts to the respondent to come forward with rebuttal evidence.”
• no discretionary application required where action commenced as a materialman’s lien against property
• no application needed where underlying action involved materialman’s lien against property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).