Kelly v. Otte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that even though the plaintiff received “a receipt” for his seized property, the facts “did not evidence any intent to enter into a bailment agreement”
• noting that even though the plaintiff received “a receipt” for his seized property, the facts “did not evidence any intent to enter into a bailment agreement”
• refusing to view the unilateral act of federal officials seizing plaintiffs personal property as evidence of any intent to enter into a bailment agreement and, in addition, there was also no basis for finding consideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).