Skip to main content
· 5/2/1995

Kelly v. Okoye (In Re Kelly)

Citations

  • 182 B.R. 255
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3965
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 7271
  • 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 701
  • 1995 WL 314583

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Any reasonable doubt as to what was decided by a prior judgment should be resolved against allowing the [issue preclusive] effect.”
  • “[A] party must introduce a record sufficient to reveal the controlling facts and pinpoint the exact issues litigated in the prior action. Any reasonable doubt as to what was decided by a prior judgment should be resolved against allowing the collateral estoppel effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russell, Ollason, Volinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.