Skip to main content
· 3/6/1995

Kelly v. Mile Hi Single Ply, Inc.

Citations

  • 890 P.2d 1161
  • 19 Brief Times Rptr. 345
  • 1995 Colo. LEXIS 39
  • 1995 WL 92769

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an employer who has complied with the WCA’s insurance provisions, as well as an injured worker’s co-employees, are immune from common-law liability for such injuries
  • describing the legislative history of amendments to the WCA creating predictable liability expenses
  • “Recovery under the Act is meant to be the exclusive remedy for workers covered by its provisions.”
  • \Recovery under the Act is meant to be the exclusive remedy for workers covered by its provisions.\
  • applying the damage limitation to a rejecting officer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rovira

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.