Skip to main content
· 1/15/1882

Kelly v. McMahon

Citations

  • 33 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the procedures involved in processing and packaging loose tea into specially designed bags did not make it a new and different product as “[t]he process, starts and ends with tea.”
  • separating tea from foreign matter does not result in a new and different product
  • separating tea from foreign matter does not result in a new and different product
  • removal of impurities or foreign matter from a substance does not result in a new and different product
  • removal of impurities or foreign matter from a substance does not result in a new and different product
  • tea which was separated, blended and placed in filtered bags still tea

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.