· 7/30/1890
Kelly v. Matlock
Citations
- 85 Cal. 122
- 24 P. 642
- 1890 Cal. LEXIS 882
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the rule of lenity does not apply when the statutory provisions are unambiguous
- noting that the rule of lenity provides that statutory ambiguity is resolved in favor of the defendant, who will then receive the lesser punishment
- noting that the rule of lenity provides that statutory ambiguity is resolved in favor of the defendant, who will then receive the lesser punishment
- noting that the rule of lenity provides that statutory ambiguity is resolved in favor of the defendant, who will then receive the lesser punishment
- noting that the rule of lenity provides that statutory ambiguity is “resolved in favor of the defendant, who will then receive the lesser punishment”
- noting the rule of lenity provides that statutory ambiguity is resolved in favor of the defendant, who will then receive the lesser punishment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Works
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.