Skip to main content
· 7/30/1890

Kelly v. Matlock

Citations

  • 85 Cal. 122
  • 24 P. 642
  • 1890 Cal. LEXIS 882

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the rule of lenity does not apply when the statutory provisions are unambiguous
  • noting that the rule of lenity provides that statutory ambiguity is resolved in favor of the defendant, who will then receive the lesser punishment
  • noting that the rule of lenity provides that statutory ambiguity is resolved in favor of the defendant, who will then receive the lesser punishment
  • noting that the rule of lenity provides that statutory ambiguity is resolved in favor of the defendant, who will then receive the lesser punishment
  • noting that the rule of lenity provides that statutory ambiguity is “resolved in favor of the defendant, who will then receive the lesser punishment”
  • noting the rule of lenity provides that statutory ambiguity is resolved in favor of the defendant, who will then receive the lesser punishment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Works

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.