Kelly v. Lemberger

Citations

• 5 Cal. Unrep. 433
• 46 P. 8
• 1896 Cal. LEXIS 1121

Syllabus

<p>Mechanic’s Men—Reputed Owner of Premises.—A Claim of lien, sufficient in form is properly admitted, as against objection that it does not correctly state the names of either the owners or reputed owners of the premises, there being at the time no evidence before the court to contradict its terms.</p> <p>Mechanic’s Men—Reputed Owner.—Though One States, in his claim of lien, that a certain person is owner and reputed owner of the premises, his lien is not impaired by proof that such person was the reputed owner only.</p> <p>Mechanic’s Men—Reputed Owner.—A Finding That One was the reputed owner of premises, as alleged in a claim of mechanic’s lien, is not impaired by the fact that conveyances to other persons were on record.</p>