Kelly v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the process of rectal catheterization is not “so well known and understood by lay people that it permits a jury to infer negligence on the part of the doctors from any fact of common knowledge possessed by laymen.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).