Skip to main content
· 11/4/2004

Kelly v. Hamilton

Citations

  • 816 N.E.2d 1188
  • 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 2187
  • 2004 WL 2473838

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where insurance coverage was not at issue in the complaint nor decided by the entry of judgment in the underlying lawsuit, the insurer was not collaterally estopped from first raising the issue of coverage in proceedings supplemental

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Najam, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.