Kelly v. Borwegen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that expert testimony was necessary to explain how an automobile accident could cause plaintiff's alleged difficulty in sleeping, walking, climbing steps, and breathing, since such pain and suffering were \subjective\ and were \not obviously related to an identifiable injury\
• holding that expert testimony was necessary to explain how an automobile accident could cause plaintiffs alleged difficulty in sleeping, walking, climbing steps, and breathing, since such pain and suffering were “subjective” and were “not obviously related to an identifiable injury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).