Kelly v. Bernstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[a] non-moving party can suffer prejudice when a stay is reasonably expected to cause a significant delay in proceedings,” with a potential delay of four to six months being “significant”
• “A non-moving party can suffer prejudice when a stay is reasonably expected to cause a significant delay in proceedings.”
• “Although denying a stay can risk waste, the opposite can also be true: [G]ranting a stay may waste judicial resources.”
• “[T]he near-certainty of re-litigating complex matters does not alone justify a stay.”
• noting the court’s broad discretion on a motion to stay
• denying a stay due to concern about its indeterminate length

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).