Skip to main content
· 7/31/2003

Kelly v. Bennett

Citations

  • 792 N.E.2d 584
  • 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 1365
  • 2003 WL 21757312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that section 34-51-2-16 of the Indiana Code “requires a defendant to plead the defense in its answer if the existence of the defense is known at that time”
  • finding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the nonparty defense \where more than one and one-half years elapsed between the answer and the motion for leave to amend\
  • finding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the nonparty defense “where more than one and one-half years elapsed between the answer and the motion for leave to amend”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirsch, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.