Kelly v. Arrington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding without explanation that statements placing the plaintiff at a meeting where others allegedly colluded “could not reasonably be understood by the average layperson as having a defamatory meaning”’
• affirming summary judgment where “the statements made by Mayor Arrington could not reasonably be understood by the average layperson as having a defamatory meaning”
• “Whether a communication is reasonably capable of a defamatory meaning is a question of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).