Skip to main content
· 11/23/2004

Kelly McGoffney v. Vigo County Division of Family and Children, Family and Social Services Administration

Citations

  • 389 F.3d 750
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24336
  • 85 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,823
  • 94 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1485
  • 2004 WL 2660648

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that plaintiff’s “vague allegations” and failure to mention any specific employment action, individuals, or any specific facts, were insufficient to place the EEOC or defendant on notice of her claims
  • stating that plaintiff’s “vague allegations regarding ‘positions’ and ‘jobs’ for which she had applied were insufficient to place the EEOC . . . on notice of the particular job applications to which she was referring”
  • “the requirement that parties may raise on appeal only issues which have been presented to the district court maintains the efficiency, fairness, and integrity of the judicial system for all parties”
  • parties cannot on appeal raise issues not presented to district court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Bauer, Posner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.