Kelly Jo Stuth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming ad- mission of government’s expert testimony “defin[ing] key terms and explain[ing] common sex-trafficking dynamics” as “reliable and helpful for the jury”
• “expert testimony, which define[s] key terms and explain[s] common sex-trafficking dynamics, [is] helpful for the jury.”
• “The district court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that Landau’s expert testimony, which defined key terms and explained common sex-trafficking dynamics, was reliable and helpful for the jury.”
• “The district court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that Landau’s expert testimony, which defined key terms and explained common sex-trafficking dynamics, was reliable and helpful for the jury.”
• in prosecution for sex trafficking minors under 18 U.S.C. § 1591, court “did not abuse its discretion by concluding that Landau’s expert testimony, which defined key terms and explained common sex-trafficking dynamics, was reliable and helpful for the jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).