Kellogg v. Lavender

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[w]e have previously determined that this rule [Crim.R. 11(C)(2)] fully encompasses those procedural requirements established by the United States Constitution upon this issue”
• “the decision of whether the criminal defendant is to serve the sentences for all his crimes consecutively or concurrently is a matter of 35 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO sentencing discretion, the exercise of which is committed to the trial court”
• defendant must be informed of the sentence for each charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).